Governor Blanco continues to amaze me with new heights of ineptitude as her re-election campaign has been all but called DOA, but for the usual “anything is possible in
Her attempt to cross out the “Governor Blanco” from the “Governor Blanco’s Road Home Program” clumsily inset “President Bush” in it’s place was as subtle as the “cat” license from Monty Pythons Fish License sketch. For those of the non-Python appreciating type, it was in fact, “…a dog license with the word 'dog' crossed out and 'cat' written in in crayon.”
There may be, and I believe there is, a real issues to be made in the way the Feds are distributing (or not distributing) the funds already earmarked for the state. Arcane regulations, the per capita inequity between the relief received by
While using the omission of the region in the State of the Union Speech, and the comments by former FUBAR FEMA director Michael Brown as an opportunity to draw attention to the region (and help her sagging ratings) was certainly a reasonable strategy, Governor Blanco’s response was to through a political temper tantrum. And as John Maginnis pointed out in a recent column, no one is rallying to the cause, and as any failed attempt at grandstanding it is turning back on her:
Rule: If you are going to grandstand, be sure you have an audience, preferably one that will cheer. However that hasn’t stopped “bayonet charge” Blanco who seems to be caught in the beam from the Blame Thrower. The Times-Picayune described up her next move and summed up the results in a recent Editorial:
Gov. Blanco is trying to blame Congress and the Bush administration for the excruciating delays in the state's Road Home program. But Louisianians know better. In her efforts to deflect growing criticism about the program's slow progress, the governor says Louisianians would already have received their checks if federal funds had not been delivered "six months late."
Somehow I suspect the level of frustration would be nearly the same had had the train wreck that is the Road Home occurred in August, instead of January. And then Blanco made no move to capitalize on the “six months” by setting up the program in anticipation of the funds being allocated. And given the performance of ICF so far, the Governor should not pin her hopes on a flood of checks going out in the next six months. If anything things could get a lot uglier for the Governor when summer rolls around.
And as the article and editorial notes, no-one is fooled. A recent visit by Sen. Joe Lieberman and by Sen. Barack Obama, while a positive note overall, a great deal of time was spent in dissecting the failure of the Road Home program, and a lot less on the billions of dollars of other funding that is truly bottled up by the Feds. Without Blanco’s inept attempt “save her bacon” misdirection campaign, there might have been hope of playing for sympathy as we “had” to make it so complicated to prevent corruption to “appease” the administration…or something like that. But that would mean thinking about the state and it needs first.
[For the record, while Mississippi by the numbers received more aid than Louisiana, I do not mean to disparage our neighbors to the east, or imply that what they received was unfair. If anything, their total does not begin to address the need of the Gulf coast, and therefore

2 comments:
YOu are leaving out a few details . Aren't you?
President Bush waived federal laws to give no-bid contracts to his buddies in Iraq and again in the Katrina cleanups. On top of that he waived environmental and other laws to make it easier at the federal level to give money to his buddies without oversight. The worst of these laws that he waived was the Davis-Bacon act so that these non local, out of state Government contrators can pay less than the prevailling wages for the work done and they subsequently imported a bunch of immigrants into the gulf coast to do the work. In many cases these immigrants were not even paid. Local workers and contractors could of used the work and business to help rebvuild their communities. Instead what they got was a plan to destroy their communities.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5446965
After this culture of corruption was created he did the complete opposite with the money he “turned” over to the States. There are extra stipulations, extra regulations, and loopholes built into how the money gets approved before distribution. The whole thing makes it impossiblly hard to get that money to the people who need it the most. Like having these FEMA funds only reimburse for money spent on recovery efforts, financially strapped communities are having problems getting the work done when they don’t have the money up front to do it.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5735996
http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AI…/701250349/1002/NEWS
quote:
Louisiana had about 84,000 displaced students and has recovered only 56,000. Both Louisiana and Mississippi each got $95 million in federal funds to help higher education, even though Mississippi had 26,000 displaced students, 24 percent of the total.
quote:
In December, FEMA awarded Mississippi $280 million and Louisiana only $74 million in discretionary grants to build more permanent Katrina cottages as alternatives to FEMA trailers. She pointed out that Mississippi has 31,700 families living in FEMA trailers, while Louisiana has 64,000, more than double Mississippi’s number.
quote:
In health-care grants announced Jan. 18, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services awarded Louisiana $72 million to help rehabilitate 2,623 hospital beds but gave Mississippi $61 million to help restore 79 closed beds. Louisiana had 97 percent of the damage, but got about 55 percent of the funding.
“These facts and figures speak for themselves,” the governor said.
My criticism of the Governor is in no way meant as a challenge the items you cite. And I am in no way defending the Feds on this one.
Addressing the FEMA roadblocks, the Stafford Act, and the whoring of the recovery funds through a (old time Louisiana?) crooked Federal patronage system, inequity in the per capita awarding of funds, all suffer when the Governor (or any of our Pols) is more interested in desperate reelection tricks than what they were elected to do.
The Governors actions of the last six months or so, to me, show a total disregard for governing in an attempt to save her electoral bacon. And she is not very good at it.
Her grand misdirection campaign has, in the least, proved a distraction and, in the worst case, actively hurt the effort to address some of the issues you cite.
Post a Comment