I’ve started to peruse the massive heap of PDF’s of the newly released draft of the new Master Plan as mandated by the October Charter change. I encourage you all to look over any aspect of it that grabs your attention. This is really more than one person can tackle.
The early draft of the new Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance (CZO) maps are particularly interesting. A comparison of the existing maps with the new is pretty interesting. The redefinition of several old and new classification such as “Neighborhood Commercial” and both a low and high density “Multi-family” categories is encouraging. The first full draft of this portion is due in June, for public review. Until then a solid assessment can’t really be made.
The bottom line, so far, is that there is a lot of very sound thinking in the plan, swimming in a sea of touchy feely BS and extremely annoying copy. But exactly what value a “Master Plan” has outside of the legal outlet of a Zoning Ordinance remains to be seen.
To recap what this is all about:
The current city charter requires, in general terms, that the City Planning Commission must prepare a citywide master plan and that land use actions should be consistent with the Master Plan. Among other changes, the proposed amendment specifies the legal relationship between the Master Plan, the CZO, and the city capital plan and budget...MP
Now, that “city capital plan and budget” is an interesting bit. It says that capital improvement projects (infrastructure, city owned facilities, etc.) should conform to the plan. It has a lot of suggestions for how that might be accomplished, but at the end of the day, there isn’t really any mechanism besides good faith to see that anything conforms. At least nothing that wouldn’t make the issue of garbage contracts look like a walk through the petunias.
Besides the various creative writing exercises that are proposed for city agencies and private developers to show how their proposals “conforms” to the plan, all of it involves a whole lot of new legislation. This would include the wholesale restructuring of relationships between agencies and of the agencies themselves. Some, such as City Planning would (and do) need large funding increases and would require a huge increase in their power and reach. How comfortable some would be with that or any of the proposals is certainly a real question.
This looks to be the next series of big political football games, albeit ones with significant repercussion to the city and its future. Expect the first to be about delaying any approval until after the next City Council and Mayoral elections.
I’ll have more on this.
